Happy Beltane/Mayday

Happy Beltane/Mayday

This is a time for the ancient fertility gods, so this was originally a very sexy holiday.

Take this job, town, state and shove it

Yes it's Job seeking time again. And yes, it means sucking up to countless assholes and trying to pretend you're something your not. I figured out some time ago that what ever career you want, what ever you try to sell, the message is SUCK UP!!!! If they ever make my book into a movie, I can be sure they'll fuck it up so bad, all I'll nearly die of embarrassment and the money will be the only thing that saves me.

I work for a number of school systems and the worst is the main on in this area. I won't say who they are in case they read this. But they seem to have a policy that the higher you climb in the school system, the more incompetent you are expected to be. It must be based on some type of nepotism.

Most of the people in this area are so stupid that if their brains could be put in the birds, they'd all fly backward. The other day some idiot writes to the news paper to praise our Kansas Rep. in the House for getting taxpayers money to build a canal to fix the flooding problem on Cowskin Creek. Actually the problem started when the city started letting land developers (lousy fucking blood suckers that they are) build homes directly in the creek's flood plain. Any one with an IQ over 12 could look at those homes and tell they were due to get flooded.

DUUU!!!!!!!








So I've spent the day getting different stories from the school principals than the personnel people. In the mean time, I'm sick of being a sub teacher. It's ridiculously easy because I'm nothing more than an overplayed baby sitter and that's not what I spent almost $30,000 going to school to do. It was an OK pud job for a while, but I need a challenge.



I was talking to someone the other day about writing another book that has sex in it, since most of my future book ideas aren't like that. They also won't have a lot of drug use tales in them. People started giving me ideas on what the public will buy. I don't mind writing another saucy raunchy book, but I don't write for the benefit of the public. I write what I want. I do try to write interesting things people will buy, but if some one doesn't like a book I wrote, or how it ends, or the nature of the subject or character, FUCK 'EM.





I'm looking for a quality audience, not a quantity audience.


Substance over style!


If you want a good career – bend over and spread your cheeks!!!!!


If you want to maintain your dignity and not go jobless and homeless – See above!

Excerpts from my new book Can you pass the Acid Test?

Can you pass the Acid Test?



Chapter 6



News papers


Yellow Journalism and outright rebellion






1960s

The New York Times ran huge articles with headlines warning its readers that drug use and trafficking was on the rise. The paper ran the article "The Drug Scene: Dependence Grows" (Jan. 8, 1969), the first in a five part series. The article started on the front page, then took up more than a half page inside the newspaper. As was typical of the 1960s, the two drugs that grabbed headlines were marijuana and LSD. The article started out reporting on a cafe in the Haight-Ashbury district of San Francisco. It reported that the drug scene was a result of changing American cultural values. Especially under attack, according to the article, was the Protestant work ethic, that holds that hard work is the way to spiritual salvation as well as earthly rewards. Also singled out was the "pioneer spirit" where man has dominated his environment. An example given was that of the founding fathers carving out the wilderness. The article reported that drug use had left the slums. It explained the traditional view of a drug addict as that of an unemployed minority in a rat infested slum. Not only had middle class offspring created a counter-drug-culture, separate from their parent's upbringing, but drug use was spilling into the straight world. Business people and common workers were starting to use drugs also. The article summed up the fears of middle-class America that drug use was "associated with passivity, introspection, mysticism, hedonism and nihilism."[1]

The last article in the series dealt with the trafficking of drugs. At that time, much of the marijuana in the US came from Mexico or other foreign countries. New York was presented as a major entry point. In the article "The Drug Scene: Nation's Illegal Traffic Is Valued at Up to $400-Million Annually" a kicker headline read: "New York Called Distribution Area, Most Marijuana Smuggled From Mexico Lands Here, in Chicago or Los Angeles." The article claimed anyone could go to Mexico, make a buy and become a smuggle. According to the Times, the hard narcotic heroin was still controlled by organized crime. But marijuana smuggling and the underground chemists who made LSD were either individuals or small organizations. The traditional "Mafia" didn't see much profit in smuggling marijuana.

According to John E. Storer, chief of the California Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement:

"Anybody with an automobile can be a narcotics peddler by driving to Mexico and purchasing any quantity he desires." Yet a reporter who tried to buy heroin said such contacts were not that easy to make. The heroin dealers were more careful and suspicious of strangers.[2]

Drugs were just beginning to show up in the mid-west, by the late 1960s. There were occasional news stories about drug busts, but often mid-west newspapers had drug stories from other parts of the country such as "13 Careers in Navy Go to Pot," in The Wichita Eagle (Feb. 22, 1968).[3] The Eagle also ran an article about the underground "hippie" newspapers that were springing up across the US. The article started out with a headline kicker that read:

"Curiosity over the hippies was reflected again and again in a survey of what is on readers minds. This article explores one aspect of the hippie culture that is readily available to outsiders: the underground press."[4]

The article then describes some of the better known underground papers of the period, including the Berkeley, Calf. , Barb, the East Village Other, published in New York's Grenwich Village and The Loss Angeles Free Press.

One Eagle article reported a decline in the use of LSD. The FDA had reported that there was less of that drug on the street.[5] Wichita would see an increase in that drugs use by the early 1970s.

1940s

The New Orleans' Morning Tribune printed a number of horror stories, during the 1940s, about marijuana, including "SCHOOL CHILDREN FOUND IN GRIP OF MARIJUANA HABIT BY INVESTIGATORS." According to Morning Tribune staff reporters: they mingled with dope peddlers only to find they were selling "muggles" (a slang term for marijuana cigarettes) to school children. One kicker for the article states: "Scrupulous Peddlers Openly Sell Drug to Boys Of Tender Age Who Appear on Streets Under Its Influence" and "Police Have Become Hardened to Sight of 12 Year Olds "Muggle Up".' Another article's headline stated: "MARIJUANA FOUND EASY TO PURCHASE!"[6]



1930s

Articles appeared in the 1930s newspapers that indicated the US was still in the process of creating a world-wide ban on the use of narcotics. An article in The New York Times (May 23, 1935) reported that Dr. H. J. Wollner, consulting chemist for the US Treasury Department, had urged the governments involved in the Advisory Opium Committee of the League of Nations to develop more cooperation in the exchange of information, needed to fight the trafficking of narcotics. The report said more conferences would be set up "for the repression of illicit drug traffic." The paper reported that 33 countries were involved in the committee besides the US.[7]

1920s

Many drug articles in the 1920s and 1930s were reports of people being arrested for narcotics possession or trafficking. The New York Times reported the bust of a heroin distribution center were detectives found about $5,000 worth of the drug (July 25, 1923). They seized 42 ounces of heroin from a railroad yard.[8]

Newspapers also titillated readers with stories of celebrities that were busted for drug offenses. The New York Times told its readers "Early morning patrons of the E.& L. Restaurant, 153 West Forty-forth Street, yesterday saw five pretty bobbed-haired



actresses escorted from the place by detectives of the narcotic division, who place them under arrest on finding a white powder supposed to be heroin"[9] (Aug. 6, 1923). They were only local actresses and the story was buried inside. Yet the tone of the article was common and not unlike today's tabloids that splash big headlines when a celebrity gets caught with drugs.

In the 1920s there were several lay groups formed to fight against the "narcotics menace." These groups wanted prohibition with tough penalties and they ridiculed clinics that tried to wean addicts off of drugs gradually. Some of those groups included The International Narcotic Education Association (1923), the World Conference on Narcotic Education (1926) and the World Narcotic Defense Association (1927), which were created by Richmond P. Hobson, a Spanish American War hero and prohibition propagandist. His crusade made use of exaggerated numbers of estimated addicts in the US and he linked narcotic use to serious crime. Hobson often relied on radio broadcasts to get his message out. But he was joined by William Randolph Hearst who used his Seattle Post-Intelligencer to stop the opening of narcotics clinics in the Seattle, Wash. area.[10]

1916

Articles in The New York Times, at the turn of the century, are a good example of the kinds of yellow journalism that would resurface over the next century. An article called "Finds Drug Evil Pervades the City" (Dec. 5, 1916), had a headline kicker that warned "Legislative Committee Hears Addicts Now Number 200,000." It also warned that narcotic addiction was reaching into the "upperworld" which included judges, physicians, lawyers and ministers. The article's lead paragraph starts out:

"The drug evil has now reached into every corner of the city with amazing rapidity, according to testimony given at the City Hall yesterday, afternoon at the first hearing of the Joint Legislative Committee appointed last spring to investigate the habit-forming drug traffic, with a view to remedial legislation."[11]

In another article, "Fight Drug Evil In 2 Hemispheres" (Nov. 5, 1916), claimed that enlisted soldiers in the US Army were using narcotics. The article also described laws that were passed in England, modeled after the Harrison Act, of 1914, that started narcotic prohibition in the US.[12]

1800s

In the mid1800s, the temperance movement attacked alcohol the way modern day parents groups and cultural warriors attack drugs. A well known temperance paper from the 1850s, The Lily, had this to say:

"Drunkenness is not our sin alone, but it is our particular sin- our great sin."[13]

As with other such papers, such as the Temperance Recorder, religion was a strong motivating factor. But there were also some feminist who were caught up in the Temperance movement and some of their papers were even designed and edited by women, such as the New York Olive Plant (1842) and the New York Pearl (1846).[14]

The temperance movement tried to ally itself with the issue of abolishing slavery, much as the modern anti-abortion movement has tried associate itself with that historical movement..

Mainstream opposition to the war on drugs

Despite the tradition of yellow journalism in dealing with the drug issue, there have been some exceptions. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch ran an editorial, "THE WAR ON DRUGS, A bright and shining lie" (Feb. 10, 2001), comparing the war on drugs to the Vietnam War, both un-winnable and futile. They blasted the government's lack of funding for treatment and said that drug abuse should be treated as a health problem rather than a law-and-order problem.[15]

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch ran articles focused on accidental police shootings, related to drug enforcement. In Bill McCellan's column, "Two police shootings show upside-down priorities of drug war" (Feb. 11, 2001), he complained that undercover police shot an unarmed small-time drug dealer and an innocent bystander. As the dealer's car attempted to evade police, they opened fire, killing both occupants. The dealer was driving a friend, who had no known police record and was not under any suspicion of using or selling drugs. Another woman was killed after police broke her door down and shot her claiming her, shinny cell phone looked like a gun. McClellan point out:

"If people want to use mind-altering drugs, they will. If there is quick money to be made providing these drugs, people will provide them. We can't stop them with prisons and bullets." he goes on to say the money would be better spent on treatment and education.[16]

The Kansas City Star ran an article in which police through a rock through the window of a home, to distract what they thought were crack dealers inside. They went to the wrong house and hit an elderly woman in the head. Minutes later, they accidentally shot a man in the shoulder. The paper's headline tried to play down the mistakes with: "Case study of a raid: A healthy haul of drugs despite a few mishaps"(June 24, 1990).[17] Kansas City's drug mishaps got better coverage from the newspaper of a small Kansas town, Hutchinson. The Hutchinson News (June 16, 1991) ran an Associated Press article in which innocent people were handcuffed, an innocent man was beaten with a flashlight and search warrants had no actual addresses on them. The warrants relied on descriptions of the homes rather than addresses.[18]

The Hutchinson News was also one of the few newspapers to give an in depth and critical coverage to the Panama invasion. The Bush administration's justification for the invasion was that Panama's President Manuel Noriega was actually a drug dealer. The Hutchinson News gave full coverage, some of which backed Bush opponents' claims that the CIA wanted to use Noriega to put pressure on the Sandinista leadership in nearby Nicaragua. The headlines were fairly revealing: "U.S. considered killing Noriega" (Feb. 25, 1990) and "Noriega trial begins this week; Controversial trial to be colored by conspiracy theory" (Sept. 3, 1991).[19]

During the peak of Reagan's war on drugs, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch ran an article that criticized his "war on drugs" strategy. In "'Drug War' Only Latest Skirmish," (Sept. 7, 1986), the Post said "While Reagan has made anti-drug efforts a major issue, his administration has been inconsistent in its support for drug education and treatment programs, some experts say." The article noted that the "newest campaign comes in the aftermath of what one commentator called a 'media-borne cocaine panic,' fueled by the recent introduction of 'crack'."[20] The article's main argument was that there was far too little money being spent on drug treatment.

Even though The New York Times article "Finds Drug Evil Pervades the City" (Dec. 5, 1916) threw a lot of alarmist statistics at the reader, regarding the "evil" of narcotic addiction, it supported the treatment view as opposed to the criminal view that was pushed by Hearst's newspapers. The article cited the advise of Dr. Ernest C. Bishop:

"When asked by Chairman Whitney if he believed narcotics should be prescribed for a man, for instance, 60 years old who had been using drugs for twenty-five years, (Bishop) answered in the affirmative."

Even with the yellow journalism of the time period, there was still some debate as to how the nation should address the drug problem. The idea of locking addicts up and denying them short-term use of narcotics was being opposed by knowledgeable medical authorities.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] J. Anthony Lukas, "The Drug Scene: Dependence Grows," The New York Times, (8 January 1968), vol. CXVII no. 40,161, pp. 1 - 22.

[2] Martin Waldron, "The Drug Scene: Nation's Illegal Traffic Is Valued at Up to $400-Million Annually," The New York Times, (12 January 1968), vol. CXVII no. 40, 165, p. 30.

[3] New York Times News Service, "13 Careers in Navy Go to Pot," The Wichita Eagle, (22 February 1968), vol. 96 no. 53, p. 3B.

[4] Jerry Buck, New York A.P., "Hippie Underground Papers Pop Up Like Wildflowers," The Wichita Eagle, (23 February 1968), vol. 96 no. 54, p. 11A.

[5] A.P., "Bureau Chief Sees Decline In Use of LSD," The Wichita Eagle, (29 February 1968), vol. 96 no. 60, 3A.

[6] William Daniel Drake, "The Connoisseur's Handbook of Marijuana," Jr., p, . 61.

[7] "Police Chemistry' Is Urged At Geneva," The New York Times, (28 May 1935), vol. LXXXIV no. 28,243, p. 15.

[8] "Heroin Raid Yields Store Worth $5,000," The New York Times, (25 July 1923), vol. LXXII no. 23,923, p. 18.

[9] "Five Actresses Held, Arrested In Restaurant, Charged With Having Narcotics," The New York Times, (6 August 1923), vol. LXXII no. 23,935, p. 22.

[10] David F. Musto, M.D., "The American Disease," (Oxford University Press, New York, 1999), p. 190 -193.

[11] "Finds Drug Evil Pervades the City," The New York Times, (5 December 1916), vol. LXVI no. 21,500, p. 4.

[12] "Fight Drug Evil In 2 Hemispheres," The New York Times, (5 November 1916), vol. LXVI no. 21,470, p.19.

[13] Ian R. Tyrrell, Women and Temperance in Antebellum America, 1830 - 1860, edited in Randall Woods, Willard Gatewood, America Interpreted, Volume 1 : to 1877, (Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth, 1998), pp. 333, 334.

[14] Ian R. Tyrrell, Women and Temperance in Antebellum America, 1830 - 1860, p. 338.

[15] Editorial, "THE WAR ON DRUGS, A bright and shining lie," St. Louis Post-Dispatch, (10 February 2001) vol. 123 no. 41, p. 3O.

[16] Bill McClellan, "Two police shootings show upside-down priorities of drug war," St. Louis Post-Dispatch, (11 February 2001), vol. 123 no. 42, pp. C1, C6.

[17] Phil Jurik, "Case study of a raid: A healthy haul of drugs despite a few mishaps," The Kansas City (Missouri) Star, (24 June 1990), vol. 110 no. 254, pp. 1A, 11A.

[18] AP, "Police drug raid goes bust; Group of officers raid wrong house, greatly damages it," The Hutchinson (Kansas) News, (16 June 1991), year 119 no. 348, p. 3, Otto, "War on Drugs/ War on People," pp. 52 - 53.

[19] Douglas Franzt, Ronald J. Ostrow, "U.S. considered killing Noriega," The Hutchinson News, (25 February 1990), p. 18, Richard Cole, "Noreiga trial begins this week; Controversial trial to be colored by conspiracy theory," The Hutchinson News, (3 September 1991), pp. 1, 16, Otto, "War on Drugs/ War on People," pp. 78 - 80.

[20] Robert L. Koenig, "'Drug War' Only Latest Skirmish," St. Louis Post-Dispatch, (7 September 1986), vol. 108 no. 250, pp. 1A, 6A

Fuck political correctness

When the term "political correctness" first came out, I thought it was a right-wing conspiracy to attack everyone on the left, by making up a movement that really didn't exist so Right-winger could attack any one who gets the upper hand on their arguments.

It may have started that way, but the right-wingers have lost their monopoly on hating political correctness. At first it was a group of racist who said they had the right do debate race issues. But now, it's become a struggle for anyone who wants to question a policy from drunk driving laws to questioning the dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan during World War II. It turns out there are a dozen no no's that are not to be discust or laughed about on both the left and the right.

Once Lenny Bruce made a joke about kids sniffing airplane glue on The Steve Allen Show, about the late 1950s. That kind of humor would never be allowed on today's TV. Roseanne Barr wanted to make a US version of the British comedy "Absolutely Fabulous," a sitcom where two women in their late thirties spend all day drunk and stoned. The daughter of one of the women plays the straight roll. But there was no way to sanitize such a show for politically correct US TV. There are too many topics today that are just not politically correct. For instance, jokes about drinking are fewer and fewer, not like the old Jackie Gleason show or Otis on The Andy Griffith Show, where he gets drunk every Saturday night.



Pot jokes are out. And drugs are not the only thing that Americans don't believe in joking about. People were offended by my first Pol Pot Myspace site. I had some satirical pop art and I actually tried to explain the humor so some moron who thought it was meant to glorifying Pol Pot.

Of course I got two more complaints, all white folks who went there and "saw the damage done" by this man and I was insulting the Cambodian people. I actually had Cambodians on the friends list. So it was nosy Americans, mostly, who felt my site was offensive and managed to get it closed. So much for freedom of speech.



There's a lot a things we Americans can't joke about anymore. Certain political figures can't be touched. The flag is a sacred symbol that may have a constitutional protection in the future and after that, who knows what subjects will be protected from criticism by the very constitution that gave us the first amendment of free religion and free speech.

Frank Zappa, defending rock music lyrics, once pointed out that labeling or limiting what people can sing about is basically saying that ideas alone are dangerous. Jerry Ruben once joked that you can yell theater in a crowded fire. Lately I'd like to yell fire in a crowded theater.




Yes, I'm sick of a politically correct society where we can't joke about drugs, alcohol or Pol Pot. I even feel for those who want to discuss Hitler. After all, he didn't kill 6 million Jews. That number is a rounded off estimate. That he killed Jews is a fact. The exact number has never been determined and since many Jews disappeared without leaving behind a trace, it may not be possible to get an exact figure. Even stating this could get people angry as if I'm anti-Semitic. But the Anti-Defamation League, the so called "defender of Jews" is presently going after a man, David Vaughan Icke, who believes the world is partially run buy six foot lizards. Members of the Anti-Defamation League are convinced he really means Jews. It would seem that they are both this Crazy. Of course I could be accused of being anti-Semitic for opposing the Anti-Defamation League.



Monitor lizards can get 6 feet or longer. They are intelligent, but I don't think they're ready to run the world of humans quite yet.

So to all of this I say FUCK POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. If you don't like what I have to say, you don't have to listen and I will kindly let you know that I think you should go off and fuck yourself.

April Fools

New Teen Idol chosen.